War Horse is a children’s book by Michael Morpurgo originally published in 1982. In recent years it has become well known as a stage play seen mainly by adults and it was really only a matter of time before a transition to the screen would happen. Directed by Stephen Spielberg, the film stars some of the best of Britain’s current actors and some superb newcomers. But what should a military historian make of such a film?
Before I went to see it today I had been keeping an eye on comments via online reviews and on WW1 sites like the Great War Forum. The latter has at least two threads running where some of the more serious types who frequent it have nothing good to say, but it is hard to tell if they have actually seen the film or not. The key contention is the history; in theirs and many others eyes it is ‘wrong’ and presents an outdated view of the war. For me the history side of it was the least of the issues that troubled me about War Horse; generally speaking an attempt had been made to get it right from the chronology of the uniforms and equipment to the ‘feel’ of the battlefield. Aspects of the story do indeed defy historical disbelief, but for a story that had its setting in the Great War it was convincing, in the same way that other good war films draw you into the period.
What surprised me was that it did not feel like a Spielberg film at all. When I think of Saving Private Ryan there was a great sense of place in that film; the battle sequences did not feel like they were taking place in isolation. In War Horse they did; the cavalry charge at the start being the most baffling – the British cavalry regiment appearing to be the only Allied soldiers on the field. The trench scenes got less convincing when you saw the same brick arch in both British and German positions and that the trenches had been made straight to allow the rails of the dolly to be laid for tracking shots. The last scence in France where the auction took place was so obviously filmed in Britain and looked nothing like rural France, making it yet again seem odd. Whether this was a budget aspect or not I have no idea.
But while a few points like this did niggle me, what the naysayers fail to take into account is that this film is fiction. It isn’t a documentary; it has a basis in the past, but the reality of that past has been stretched to make the story, and that is not different to any other film. Do go and see it; War Horse is hugely enjoyable; the character of Albert is wonderfully played by the unknown Jeremy Irvine and the horses are simply fantastic; and they are the real stars of the tale from start till end. And it is beautifully shot with some stunning landscapes.
The huge public interest in the film – the cinema was packed today with another same-sized crowd waiting to get in, and this seems typical across the country – means that this will be very much the talk of the battlefields this year; it will become a point of reference for many, and while it’s history may be dodgy in places and the story more than a little far-fetched, thousands will think about the Great War when before they did not, and some will go on to read books like Richard Van Emden’s Tommy’s Ark or J.E.B. Seeley’s Warrior – or just rekindle a feint memory of grandad’s story of the cry of those noble beasts who served and suffered under the clash of the guns. In some ways that is where the film should have ended – with the Animals in War Memorial in London and a rememberance of the millions of animals who died, and never made it home like Joey.
While I spend most of my professional, and a good portion of my personal life on and around battlefields, this year has certainly been a busy one. I started in January going backwards and forwards to Arnhem and Normandy getting things organised for Dig WW2 and then went into the filming for that in Belgium, France, Holland, and Germany, with our last overseas shoot in July. I also found myself in Italy for a month this year either working on TV projects or guiding groups. But for the Great War it was a quiet year, as time only permitted me to do a handful of Recces or tours on the Western Front; in fact in twelve months I only found myself in Ypres twice, something that hasn’t happened for more than 20 years. The autumn into the winter saw the start of two new TV projects, one we have started filming for Channel 5 – Hero in the Family. As snow descends on the old battlefields in Europe, it certainly is time for a break.
Today is a fitting one to be reviewing a new iPad App about the attack on 
During some research for an upcoming television series, I had the privilege of spending some time at the site of the Concentration Camp at 
The Heroes of Hailsham
During the Great War more men were wounded than died; something that is often forgotten. Some men were wounded several times, others once and so badly that it lead to their discharge from the army. Men with missing limbs back in civilian life could never be mistaken for anything but what they were – wounded ex-soldiers. But some wounds that lead to men being discharged were not so visible; and many men left the army with sickness caused by active service. In the early period of the war such men found themselves the centre of unwanted attention from over zealous patriots – often young women – who would step forward and present the seemingly fit and un-uniformed young man with a white feather, implying his cowardice for not enlisting.

It is at this time of year all our thoughts turn to those who fought and died in the Two World Wars, and subsequent conflicts. For myself, I am lucky that my life has been touched by knowing many veterans, of many different conflicts. I grew up of course with my father and all my uncles, all WW2 veterans, and was lucky to know several hundred Great War veterans whom I interviewed in the 1980s. The last of ‘my’ WW1 veterans died just as I moved to live on the Somme, and I wondered if I would ever know men like that again. But working as a battlefield guide for many years I have been privledged to meet veterans on a regular basis. In the last decade, just as with those from the trenches, I have got to known dozens of WW2 veterans who have become good and valued friends; and I have been fortunate to spend time with them on the battlefields where they fought as young men and women. But it’s not just the World Wars; I’ve spent many a night in the bar of a hotel with a Falklands veteran talking about Bluff Cove or Goose Green, or with a man who defended a sangar in NI and more recently those who served in Iraq or Afghanistan. There is often a common thread I’ve seen over three decades of talking to these men; regret at the loss of comrades, sadness that so many acts of bravery go unrewarded or recognised, and a common desire not to tell of their experiences, but at the same time to want to; to share that journey into Hell, to make some sense of it.
I was pleased to get an email from a friend letting me know that this Out of Battle Blog has received a positive review on the Culture 24 website. The full review is shown above. The website describes itself:






















